QCN9274 vs QCN9224 chip performance comparison-wireless communication innova...

wallys

QCN9274 vs QCN9224 chip performance comparison-wireless communication innova... [复制链接]

In the field of wireless communication, the choice of chip has an important impact on device performance and power consumption. Here, we will compare and analyze the characteristics and performance of the QCN9274 and QCN9224 chips in order to better understand their differences and application scenarios.

1. Technical specifications

- **QCN9274: **
- Supported wireless standards: Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2
- Frequency band: 2.4GHz, 5GHz, 6GHz
- Maximum speed: 9.6Gbps
- Chip manufacturing process: 7 nm

- **QCN9224: **
- Supported wireless standards: Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.1
- Frequency band: 2.4GHz, 5GHz
- Maximum speed: 3 Gbps
- Chip manufacturing process: 10 nm

### 2. Performance comparison

- ** Speed: The ** QCN9274 has a higher speed of 9.6 Gbps, which is much higher than the 3 Gbps of the QCN9224. It is suitable for application scenarios that require high speed.

** Frequency band: ** QCN9274 supports a wider frequency band, including the 6GHz Wi-Fi 6E band, which gives it an advantage in spectrum utilization and anti-interference ability.

- ** Process: ** QCN9274 uses a more advanced 7 nm process, compared to the QCN9224 10 nm, with lower power consumption and higher performance advantages.

### 3. Application scenario

- **QCN9274: **
Applications with high speed and frequency band requirements, such as HD video transmission, virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) devices.
Low power and high performance Internet of Things (IoT) devices are needed, especially in dense device deployments.

- **QCN9224: **
- Traditional Wi-Fi devices that do not have particularly high speed and frequency band requirements, such as home routers, smart speakers, etc.
- Low-power application scenarios, but do not require particularly high rates.

### 4. Cost considerations

Due to the higher performance and advanced process of the QCN9274, its cost may be relatively high. The QCN9224 may be more suitable for scenarios with cost constraints, but there will be certain limitations in terms of speed and frequency band.

### Conclusion

There are significant differences between QCN9274 and QCN9224 in terms of performance, band support and process, so the choice needs to be balanced according to the specific application needs. If there are high requirements for speed, frequency band and power consumption, and the budget is sufficient, QCN9274 may be a better choice. If there are cost constraints, and the rate and frequency band requirements are not particularly high, the QCN9224 may be more suitable.

Wallys core capacities: 👇
Scoping (Product Specifications, Estimated Project Timeline, Estimated Unit Cost)
New Product Development (from product concept to mass production)
Value Engineering (for customers with existing product design)
Schematic Drawing & PCB Design Layout Services
Industrial Design Services
Software Development Services(firmware compilation,QSDK driver porting, 3rd party ecosystem support to target platform ,etc)
Test Development Services
Product Regulatory Compliance
If you are looking for a powerful Mfg to do OEM for a large project in wireless industry at reasonable and affordable cost, welcome to reach out us and what our teams can bring you !  💡
Clients: TIP,Facebook, Openwrt, etc
Email:sales@wallystech.com
WEB:https://www.wallystech.com/